History and the Truth

“Now in other spheres of human life we should perhaps not rule out such partiality.  A good man ought to love his friends and his country, and should share both their hatreds and their loyalties. But once a man takes up the role of the historian he must discard all considerations of this kind.  He will often have to speak well of his enemies and even award them the highest praise should their actions demand this, and on the other hand criticize and find fault with his friends, however close they may be, if their errors of conduct show that this is his duty.  For just as a living creature, if it is deprived of its eyesight, is rendered completely helpless, so if history is deprived of the truth, we are left with nothing but an idle, unprofitable tale.  We must therefore not shrink from accusing our friends or praising our enemies, nor need we be afraid of praising or blaming the same people at different times, since it is impossible that men who are engaged in public affairs should always be in the right, and unlikely that they should always be in the wrong.  We must detach ourselves from the actors in our story, and apply to them only such statements and judgements [sic] as their conduct deserves.” Polybius, Histories I. 14. in The Rise of the Roman Empire, trans. Ian Scott-Kilvert (London 1979), p. 55. [Emphasis added]

 

 

This entry was posted in history, Polybius. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.